Which of the following Statements concerning the Free Trade Agreement (Fta) Is True

Home // Which of the following Statements concerning the Free Trade Agreement (Fta) Is True

In economic theory, the cost of all factors of production likely to cross borders would entail equal costs in all trading countries if the factors of production were entirely mobile. This would mean that the basis of comparative advantage for trade between countries would diminish and that there would ultimately be less international trade. In the modern world, free trade policy is often implemented by mutual and formal agreement between the nations concerned. However, a free trade policy may simply be the absence of trade restrictions. Few issues divide economists and the general public as much as free trade. Research suggests that economists at U.S. universities are seven times more likely to support free trade policies than the general public. In fact, the American economist Milton Friedman said, “The economic profession was almost unanimous about the desirability of free trade.” China has comparable trade surpluses. However, China pegged the renminbi to the dollar, preventing its exchange rate from rising, thus restoring a trade balance.

China does this by using the dollars it accumulates from its trade surplus to aggressively buy U.S. currency in the form of Treasuries. The result was an overvalued dollar and an undervalued renminbi. (This is similar to what Japan did in the early 1980s, when the yen was undervalued and the dollar was overvalued.) In economic theory, an “undervalued exchange rate is both an import tax and an export subsidy, and therefore the most mercantilist policy imaginable.” [32] However, a number of countries – including Japan, South Korea, China and a few other Far Eastern countries – have adopted a neo-mercantilism model in which they seek to develop through aggressive export expansion combined with a very moderate reduction in import barriers. These countries seek to develop powerful export industries by initially protecting their domestic industries from foreign competition and providing subsidies and other forms of support to stimulate growth, often including currency manipulation. [15] A second type of model commonly used is the gravity model, which assumes that large economies have greater attractiveness to trade flows than small economies and that proximity is an important factor influencing trade flows. And another common type is a partial equilibrium model that estimates the impact of a trade policy measure on a particular sector, not on the economy in general. Partial equilibrium models do not take into account connections to other sectors and are therefore useful when contagion effects are likely to be negligible.

However, partial equilibrium models are more transparent than CGE models, and it is easier to see the effects of modified assumptions. In order to minimize the possible negative effects of these trading blocs, Article XXIV of the GATT requires members of a customs union or free trade agreement to remove barriers to trade for “almost all” trade relations between them and that all GATT members have the opportunity to review the agreement. In the event that a GATT member that is not a party to the customs union faces higher tariffs on certain products when establishing a customs union, Article XXIV requires that member to be compensated for the loss of trade. However, as noted in Chapter 2, Article XXIV has proven to be totally ineffective in limiting the growth of trading blocs; As a result, trade flows are now heavily distorted by these preferential regimes. Another important assumption of traditional economic theory is that basic factors of production such as land, labor, and capital are not exchanged across borders. Although Ohlin considered that these basic factors of production were not traded, he argued that relative yields of factors of production between countries tend to be balanced when goods are traded between countries. Subsequently, Samuelson argued that factor prices would in fact be balanced under free trade conditions, and this is called in economics the factor price equalization theorem. [7] This could mean, for example, that international trade would lead to wage rates for unskilled workers in high-wage countries falling to the same level as wages in low-wage countries relative to rents available from capital, and wages to increase relative to rents available from capital in low-wage countries and corresponding to the level of country. in which work is less abundant. (The implications of this are important and will be explored in more detail in Chapter 8.) The second parallel agreement is the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), which established the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) in 1994. The CEC`s mission is to improve regional environmental cooperation, reduce potential trade and environmental conflicts and promote the effective enforcement of environmental law.

It also facilitates cooperation and public participation in efforts to promote the conservation, protection and enhancement of the North American environment. It consists of three main components: the Council (Ministers of the Environment), the Joint Public Advisory Committee (JPAC) and the Secretariat based in Montreal. It has an annual budget of $9 million, with Canada, Mexico and the United States contributing $3 million per year, and is governed by consensus (not the majority). A number of factors can affect the terms of trade, including changes in demand or supply or government policy. In the example above, as Japanese demand for aircraft increases, trading conditions will shift in favor of the United States, as it can charge more TVs for each aircraft. Alternatively, when the Japanese start producing aircraft, the commercial conditions will change in favor of Japan because the supply of aircraft will now be greater and the Japanese will have other sources of supply. In this world, the classic Ricardian business model provided a good explanation of the structure of trade, e.B which countries would produce which products. England would produce textiles according to its wool production and availability of capital, and Portugal would produce wine according to its sunshine and fertile soil.

If Portugal chose to hinder the import of British textiles, its own economy would be less prosperous and it would still be in Britain`s interest to allow the free import of Portuguese wine. The United States currently has a number of free trade agreements in place. These include multinational agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which covers the United States, Canada and Mexico, and the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), which covers most Central American countries. There are also separate trade agreements with countries ranging from Australia to Peru. Under certain conditions, improving a country`s productivity can worsen its terms of trade. For example, as Japanese TV manufacturers become more efficient and selling prices fall, Japan`s terms of trade will deteriorate as more TVs have to be exchanged for the plane. The classic Western business model was based on the economic realities of the eighteenth century. The factors of production were relatively fixed: the land was immobile (although its fertility or use might change) and labour mobility was severely constrained by political constraints.

For most of the century, cross-border capital movements were constrained by political barriers and a lack of knowledge of other markets. (By the mid-nineteenth century, however, capital and labor were flowing more freely between Europe and America.) Technology in the eighteenth century was relatively simple by today`s standards and relatively similar in all countries. In addition, the production of most products at that time was subject to declining yields, which meant that as production increased, the cost of producing each additional unit increased. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was inspired by the success of the European Economic Community (1957-93) in eliminating tariffs to boost trade among its members. Proponents argued that establishing a free trade area in North America would bring prosperity through more trade and production, resulting in the creation of millions of well-paying jobs in all participating countries. Fourth, Western economic theory assumes that trade will be reasonably balanced over time. If this is not the case, this indicates that the deficit country will import products where it would normally have a comparative advantage; If these products are located in areas where production costs are decreasing, the industry could lose its ability to compete in global markets over time. In addition to reorienting trade and creating trade, which are essentially static effects, participants in free trade areas and customs unions are also looking for dynamic advantages. B such as an expansion of production, as firms take advantage of the growing size of the market to increase production and improve efficiency, as firms adapt to increasing competition. Access to a larger market is particularly important for small countries whose economies are too small to justify large-scale production.

[7] A good explanation for this theorem, which shows a hypothetical trade relationship between two countries, is available at faculty.washington.edu/danby/bls324/trade/hos.html. .